Another Display of Hypocrisy From the So-called “Tolerance” (homosexual activists) Crowd
Homosexual activists used bullying and coercion tactics to take over the American Psychiatric Association (APA) in 1973. They started getting access by infiltrating conventions and ended by getting psychiatrist’s licenses pulled for offering reparative therapy. They bullied the APA into removing homosexuality from the DSMs list of disorders in 1973.
Most mainstream scientific and medical orgs (like the American Association of Pediatrics and the American Medical Assoc, as just two of many examples) when asked about issues dealing with homosexuality, simply models their policies, statements, and decisions from what the APA puts forth. How could the APA be a credible org or source at all on this issue when they let homosexual activists decide the issue for them by means of threats, bullying, and coercion, and completely devoid of anything scientifically objective? (Rhetorical)
I have much more detailed information, but here is an article for your immediate convenience, that details this occurrence…
Also, the next article details the current state of the APA. Gregory Herek, PH.D was/is a pro-homosexual activist within APA (one of many). I suspected that he was not only a tow-the-line APA member, but I also had a feeling that he was one of the homosexual activists within the APA. Herek is good at using psychiatrict talk that can be very persuasive and deceptive to the average person.
Most people don’t realize that Herek cites debunked and fraudulent “research” such as Evelyn Hooker’s study and Alfred Kinsey. Herek also cites research from pro-pedophilia “researchers.” Sure enough, I was correct in questioning the validity of Herek’s commentary on homosexuality.
There are former psychologists and even former Presidents of the APA that have become so disenfranchised with the APA’s being more of a social activist group than an actual objective scientific or psychiatrict group, that they also now recognize NARTH as being a diamond in the rough. Of course the mainstream media won’t ever cover a story like this.
Anyway, as you’ll read in the following article, it will summarize what the climate in the APA is currently all about, and also where Dr. Jeffrey Satinover (psychologist and now world-renowned Quantum Mechanics expert) exposes Gregory Herek for what he’s really about…
I can also share additional documented from other APA members as well as homosexual activists (from pro-homosexual sources) information about the APA’s removal of homosexuality in 1973.
To get more information, please visit my Youtube channel: www.youtube.com/user/funk7000 and subscribe, friend, and/or message me, and I will be glad to share the information with you.
Thanks for visiting my page(s)! :)
Introducing children to homosexuality by telling them stories like King and King uses shame-based story lines to guilt children (as young as possible) into accepting homosexual behavior as being the same as simply trying a new food…
This is Pavlonian style brainwashing and indoctrination, plain and simple.
Not a grade or two later after books like King and King are introduced to children, they proceed to introduce graphic pamphlets, such as the littleblackbook…
This is not happening everywhere YET…mainly it’s happening in areas that have legalized same sex “marriage,” and the more same sex “marriage” is legalized, the more this will be happening.
Every child goes through the natural latency period between 2 and puberty where the opposite sex is gross or has cooties. This is a natural stage of child’s development, so they can figure out the world and how their own gender fits into it. What the homosexual activists are doing (under the guise of anti-bullying and sensitivity training) is sexualizing that “opposite sex has cooties” stage, thus confusing the child or teen into thinking that it means he/she is or may be homosexual. (Early exposure to pornography can have the same effect too). This IS indoctrination and IS child abuse, because it induces gender confusion, and is the reason why these children and teens are more susceptible to suicide ideation, especially if they don’t have such a great family life at home…
The over-simplification of “Bullying = Suicides” is an attempt to further push homosexual indoctrination on children. Nobody just decides to commit suicide overnight or in the blink of an eye. Suicide Ideation starts from within…internal conflicts, such as anxiety and depression that festers from within. Bullying may be the ‘tipping point’ that may push somebody over-the-edge, but it is NOT the root cause of suicide and suicide ideation.
If bullying were the root cause of suicide, we would have thousands of children and teens taking their own lives MONTHLY. But according to the LGBT-friendly CDC reports, we have 4,400 youth suicides per year. About 1/3 of those suicides or an average of around 1,466/year are SUSPECTED (not conclusively proven) to be committed by children/teens that identify or were perceived to be homosexual. If that 1/3 assumption is correct, then they account for only 4% of all suicides that occur in the US each year. Not something that should be ignored, but far from the epidemic the homosexual activists claim and propagate in the media. We are clearly being emotionally manipulated by the homosexual activists.
In fact, children or teens that act homosexual do not get bullied anywhere near the level and frequency that over-weight or obese children and teens get bullied. And with the obesity rates on the rise, I think that is a cause for a much bigger concern. But we won’t solve that problem by having a bunch of over-weight/obese activists pressuring schools to teach children the wonders of eating junk food and not exercising. No. We simply put forth laws and policies that any kind of bullying for any reason will NOT be tolerated and enforce them with an effective punishment, such as expulsion, and/or criminal charges of assault. At the same time, we offer help to the over-weight child/teen to get them involved in healthier activities to promote weight loss. The same approach should be used to help children overcome their same sex attractions/gender identity confusion.
Again, blaming suicides on bullying is a gross over-simplification.
You can’t stop the bleeding by putting a band-aid over a deep wound…
Here’s a video that makes a valid point about bullying…
If you think or believe that maybe bullying leads to depression, hating yourself, and anxiety, etc, then you simply need to learn how to stick up for yourself and defend yourself. Learn how to assert your confidence. I’ll give you an example…when I was 13, I wanted to fit in with the popular group of kids, so I starting picking on the same kid they were. Well, after about the 2nd or 3rd time I picked on him, he turned around, grabbed me by the neck, push me up against the wall, cocked his fist back, looked me dead in the eye, and asked me if I was going to stop. I was stronger than him, but he took me by surprise. He asserted himself and stood up to me just enough to put me in my place without harming me. I never picked on anybody ever again after that experience.
If you are someone with same sex attraction and/or is identifying themselves as homosexual, keep in mind that I know that there are many doors into the homosexual lifestyle. This is describing one of those doors. One of these days people are going to realize that the biggest bullies of them all and the ones who do the most harm to persons with same sex attraction are the homosexual activists themselves.
When two women claim they are capable of having the same relationship as a man and woman do, the implication is that every man’s contribution to relationships, marriage, and family is replaceable and unnecessary.
And two men claiming their relationship is just as much a relationship or marriage as a heterosexual committed relationship implicitly dismisses any contribution of every woman, thus also claiming women are inconsequential to relationships, marriage, and family. This is REAL (gender) discrimination.
Nobody is born homosexual, and nobody who has those feelings or desires chooses it either. There’s much confusion on this issue, and the American Psychiatric Association (APA) is NOT a legitimate organization on this issue, as people mistakenly assume, for they have been dominated and bullied by homosexual activists since the early 70s and still continue to do so. In fact, their decision to remove homosexuality from the list of disorders in 1973 was NOT based on any scientific objectivity, but a result of homosexual activist bullying, threats, and coercion.
Homosexuality is a maladaptive feeling and behavior as a result of psychological trauma having to do with gender. Another words, it is a developmental issue, so saying that those feelings or desires is a choice is irresponsible. Acting on it, however, is a choice.
The homosexual “coming out” story isn’t about finding who you are; it’s a sexualized emotional place people come to when they have given up and have let their issues take control of who they are, rather than learning to overcome them.
Studies (see above) have shown that even in the completely pro-homosexual friendly societies such as the Netherlands, New Zealand, UK, Brazil, Canada, the state of Massachusetts, the Castro District in San Fran, etc. that homosexuals still experience psychological problems 4Xs greater than the average heterosexual.
Lets say a “homosexual” gene did exist. Well, due to the much higher levels and risks of medical consequences as a result of homosexual sex in both homosexual males and females, the discovery of a “homosexual” gene, would only be MUCH more of a reason to not engage in that behavior. Just like if an alcoholic gene was found, that would be more of a reason not to take the first drink.
Orientation is NOT an identity. Nobody is born with a sexual orientation. People are NOT sexual at birth. Only the fraudulent and criminal “science” of Alfred Kinsey claims such a dangerous thing.
Even heterosexual behavior is ultimately chosen, but the biology and physiology of a man and a woman tells us what the true feelings and nature of our orientation is or at least should be…heterosexual.
Male bodies have male sex organs. Female bodies have female sex organs. DNA self-evidently ordered the production of these complimentary sexual parts …and, the only reason human bodies have sexual feelings at all, is because of the chemical and hormonal process, rooted in its procreative, heterosexual design. all studies which have claimed to find an immutable cause for same-sex attraction and sodomy have crumbled under the scrutiny of peer review.
Sexuality is based on our gender. It is NOT a ghost in a machine like what people with same sex attraction would like to believe. Gender differences exist; they are a fundamental reality of our biology and impact our psychology. Our maleness and femaleness is a key aspect to our personhood. Acknowledging, rather than ignoring (or worse denying), gender differences is the only intellectually honest response to this reality
Gender differences are complementary; individuals, our collective humanity, and society as a whole, all benefit from masculine and feminine characteristics. Our design orientates us towards the opposite sex. We are better for having men with a clear understanding of their masculinity and women with a clear understanding of their femininity.
People experiencing SSA conceptualize themselves as an abstract consciousness inhabiting an impersonal body…they think they’re a ghost in a machine. But in fact, the procreative physiological design of the body is self-evident, so any encouragement into gender bending in any way is neither ethical or healthy, and is therefore the reason why people with same sex attraction and gender identity confusion are more prone to psychological problems such as suicide ideation, and not because of the social construct of “homophobia.”
Gender identity confusion and SSA does exist in a small minority of individuals. It is a painful pathology and warrants a compassionate response. However it is not the ‘normative’ experience, and is not therefore a paradigm upon which to drive social policy and institutions.
Gender as complimentary opposites is a basic physiological reality, which unfortunately has been politicized. This is what is not helpful, and what is truly dehumanizing.
For more info…